Comments on: Rusty Nelson – Interview of former Franklin Photographer

By: freerangehumans

freerangehumans — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:46:22 +0000

@Mikki
Thank you for your insights.
I do not speak for or against either you or Rusty. My goal is the TRUTH, and making those at the VERY TOP accountable for using people such as Rusty as their puppets in criminal activities.
Am I correct in assuming that you are a convicted felon yourself? Many people would challenge your credibility. And cointelpro agents are paid to make statements exactly like yours. So things get murky very quickly.
How long and where did you share a cell? The mega doses of simultaneous medications were during his programming under incarceration in Oregon. Was that in a completely different facility than where you knew him?
I do not believe Rusty is free of wrongdoing, by any means. But taking nude photos of a consenting 17-year old girl hardly justifies locking up a person for life and throwing away the key. He remains under heavy confinement, even though he is out of jail. Our government is known for selecting individuals with proclivities toward whatever weakness they can exploit – in Rusty’s case, that would be sexual deviance. But Rusty is also very much a victim. Many factors indicate that he was identified as a good subject for experimentation from an early age. He was discharged from the military after covert drug experiments caused extreme adverse reaction. On at least four occasions, he visited Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, where advanced mind control experiments are conducted.
WE MUST NEVER LOSE OUR FOCUS ON THOSE WHO HIRED RUSTY TO TAKE PHOTOS OF GEORGE BUSH AND OTHERS IN COMPROMISING ACTIVITIES WITH CHILDREN. THESE ARE THE REAL CRIMINALS. DON’T LET THEM ESCAPE BY BLAMING THEIR PATSIES AND PUPPETS. ONLY AFTER THE TOP CRIMINALS ARE CONVICTED AND PUNISHED CAN WE AFFORD TO SPARE ANY TIME OR ENERGY ON THEIR HIRED SERVANTS.

By: Mikki

Mikki — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:49:05 +0000

I was in a jail cell with Nelson in 2005 in cell block A-2. He admittedly told me things contrary to these interviews, such as he KNEW the girl was 17 and it was “just art.” Felony 1. He admitted to having hundreds of pictures of George W. Bush participating in sexual activity with children, and also admitted to taking “hundreds” of pictures of children, trying to justify it by referring to it as “art.” He was also not on 54 medication simultaneously. Lancaster County Department of Corrections will confirm this and I personally saw him take his medications, nowhere near 54. This man was in cahoots with DeCamp. Something is not right. I heard from the horse’s mouth many things contrary to this interview. Any responses should be posted here as my contact info is not accurate for obvious reason. Can we please stop defending this guilty offender, allowing him to offend still?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:07:36 +0000

I trust no one. Parents need to wise up and keep their children close at hand. Hopefully in the next life these sickos will pay.

By: freerangehumans

freerangehumans — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:24:30 +0000

PLEASE NOTE: I have received conflicting messages from different parties who apparently have personal issues between themselves. No one would benefit from posting them publicly.

I stood up for Rusty, which only made me a target. So many deep wounds on all sides. I only wish to help the healing. I am happy to discuss personal matters privately, but only through two-way conversations can we even hope to sort things out.

If it continues to be abused, I will have to remove the option of Anonymous posting.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:41:24 +0000

Paul Bonacci was never handled by Nick Bryant and as far as Nick treating him badly I rather doubt it. As for the Paul Bonacci on Franklin Files that is in fact truely him. As for you wanting an Interview with Paul Bonacci Consider this it. As for you making claims that Nick speaks for me that is false. I Choose not to do Interviews with anyone It took Nick a very long time for me to trust him at all. As for you the things you have assumed about me only confirms that you are not one to do one with.
I know you will doubt who I really am and I do not really care.
No One would claim to be me.
Paul Bonacci

By: freerangehumans

freerangehumans — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:54:18 +0000

Anonymous [why don’t you identify yourself – and where you come from upon entering this debate? Your IP is Cox Communications in Omaha Nebraska – the very network, majority owned by the Bush family, which paid over $200,000 to buy and destroy the original “Conspiracy of Silence” and had it pulled from airing on the Discovery channel.

Again, you make more assumptions – that I am trashing Nick’s book. To the contrary, I am grateful to him for bringing this subject to greater public awareness. If you are on the side of TRUTH, then surely you understand how many layers of deception there are in this case. I am only presenting the TRUTH about what I know.

You are correct that one book could most likely not include everything – but Rusty Nelson’s photographs are at the VERY CORE of tangible proof regarding the Franklin scandal, therefore, absolutely essential to this particular book.

I have no beef with Nick Bryant. Yes, I have met him and talked with him on multiple occasions. He is what I call “personality challenged.” Not the best with people skills. That does not necessarily prevent him from being an excellent investigator / author. But it did,in this case, prevent him from obtaining a more complete set of documentation.

What proof can you present that the “Paul Bonacci” who is a regular in the Franklinfiles chat room is not some disinfo agent? I believe that he and his lovely wife who also chats there, are authentic. But, as you know, Noreen Gosch has been impersonated in the past. Why not an “invisible blogger”? I have no verifiable proof. Do you?

If you can arrange a video interview with Paul Bonacci, I would be thrilled to present his own words to the public – without being filtered through Bryant.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:09:11 +0000

There is no way that EVERYTHING could be put into one book regarding “Franklin”. You are mistaken about Paul Bonacci. He has public contact all most daily in a Franklin based chat room http://www.franklinfiles.org Your response seems like you have a beef with Nick Bryant. Have you met him? Your last paragraph sounds like you are describing a previous author of another Franklin book not Nick Bryant.
As an individual that personally knows all the authors and all most all the victims I would hope that your focus would be to promote and assist a just cause rather than trash the only triple documented authority on the subject.

By: freerangehumans

freerangehumans — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:05:06 +0000

Anonymous – Why did you assume I read Bryant’s book? Read my statement again. In fact, I was told by Paul Bonacci himself that Nick told him Rusty’s information “did not check out.”

Rusty has told me that, because Nick treated him so poorly, he refuses to give Nick full cooperation and disclosure. Rather than admit that, Nick trivilizes Rusty, and some extremely important material is missing from Bryant’s book, as a result. I repeat, NICK BRYANT COMES UP SHORT IN HIS CONCLUSIONS. Never said they were wrong. They are INCOMPLETE.

Nick should stop “handling” Bonacci by ordering him to refuse all public contact, other than through himself. If Nick had treated Rusty as a human being, rather than a commodity for personal profit, then he would have been granted more complete information.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:55:52 +0000

I find it interesting that in Jan/Feb you are stating that Nick Bryant’s book “discredits” Rusty…How could you read it when it was not even completed yet? Now the book is out and you will see that Nick does NOT discredit Rusty. He does (as a journalist with integrity) point out that some of Rusty’s assertions he was unable to document or prove. Great job Nick for your research and professionalism!